Leadership
Superintendents • district leaders
Local assessment governance, public engagement, labor partnerships, evidence systems, and implementation roadmaps.

A six-month, product-focused design laboratory for New York district teams. Participants bring existing curriculum, collaborate with peers, test practical changes, and leave with usable local assessment tools.
Trained teams may add interdisciplinary capstones; high schools may extend evidence into CTE, community-based, career-connected and work-based learning.
FOUR COORDINATED STRANDS
Superintendents • district leaders
Local assessment governance, public engagement, labor partnerships, evidence systems, and implementation roadmaps.

Grades 9–12 • Classes of 2028 & 2029
Near-term graduation-transition readiness, PBAs, portfolios, CTE and career-connected learning.

Grades 6–8
Grade-band progression, 5–7 minute Mini-Mastery, grade-level PLC maps, unit PBAs, and transition readiness.

Grades K–5
Developmentally appropriate early competencies, observation, student voice, formative evidence, and family partnerships.

| Format | Member commitment | Minimum end-of-CoP output |
|---|---|---|
| Six monthly sessions | 60 minutes/month + practical between-session work | One implemented or field-tested artifact per team |
| Quarterly cross-strand sharing | A peer review and end-of-year showcase | A shareable, improved artifact with reflection |
| District team participation | Recommended 2–4 people, including a decision-maker | Named owner, next-90-day plan and a local next step |
POLICY COMPASS
Use official NYSED guidance as the source of truth. Proposed changes must not be described as already-effective requirements.
| STUDENT GROUP | 2026–27 STATUS | CoP DESIGN IMPLICATION |
|---|---|---|
Class of 2028(current grade 11) | Proposed transition to one diploma and sunsetting passing requirements for Regents exams for graduates beginning Jan. 2028, pending regulatory action. | Counselors verify current requirements; build a local assessment inventory and student/family FAQ. |
Class of 2029(current grade 10) | Same proposed graduation transition; more time to pilot PBAs, portfolio routines, and career exploration. | Build coherent grade 10–12 learning and assessment pathways. |
“2029 Cohort”(enters grade 9 in fall 2029) | Distinct from graduating Class of 2029. This entry cohort is slated for the full PoG-aligned competency framework and universal transcript. | Middle schools prepare progression and handoffs; high schools develop future system capacity. |
| ADOPTED CONTENT | HIGH SCHOOL | MIDDLE | ELEMENTARY |
|---|---|---|---|
Personal finance education | 2026–27 | 2026–27 (grades 5–8) | 2027–28 (K–4) |
Climate education | 2027–28 | 2027–28 (grades 5–8) | 2028–29 (K–4) |
These adopted content timelines create useful curriculum entry points. They are not a statewide requirement to implement PoG in every classroom in 2026–27.
THE SIX-MONTH JOURNEY
Recommended launch: joint orientation in December 2026; monthly working sessions through May 2027.
TEAM WORK PRODUCT / COMMON LEARNING CYCLE
DEC 2026
Kickoff: define district problem, baseline, state timeline, CoP norms
JAN 2027
Audit existing curriculum and assessments; map to PoG
FEB 2027
Design Mini-Mastery routines and one rigorous PBA; cross-strand peer review
MAR 2027
Plan evidence capture, student voice, student supports, and scoring calibration
APR 2027
Field-test, review evidence, and plan implementation with stakeholders
MAY 2027
Showcase: artifact, improvement story, and scaling commitment
STRAND PLAYBOOKS
STRAND PLAYBOOK / 01
Driving question: How does a district build a trusted, coherent local assessment system that lasts beyond the launch year?
Recommended team
Superintendent or designee; curriculum/assessment leader;
principal; teacher and association representatives; optional BOCES,
student and family advisors.
| Session | DESIGN CHALLENGE | OUTPUT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Establish a shared PoG vision, baseline, and decision rights | District purpose + leadership charter |
| 2 | Inventory existing assessments, instructional initiatives, and burdens | Local assessment system map |
| 3 | Co-design coalition / town hall meeting participation with teachers/unions, students, families, local employers, local universities/colleges | Stakeholder/union engagement map |
| 4 | Agree on learning evidence standards, scoring moderation, equity and privacy | Assessment and data governance principles |
| 5 | Plan tiered teacher development, time, budget, support and dashboard | Year-one operating plan + KPIs |
| 6 | Rehearse board/community presentation and agree on next decisions | Board-ready executive brief + 90-day priorities |
A concise local assessment charter, coalition governance map, baseline scorecard and 90-day plan.
STRAND PLAYBOOK / 02
Two tracks inside one strand: near-term Classes of 2028/2029 and longer-term competency-based system capacity.
| Session | WORKSHOP | OUTPUT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Map cohort-specific graduation readiness and official guidance | Cohort impact / counselor FAQ |
| 2 | Inventory existing units, Regents/state tests, course assessments and work experiences | Local assessment evidence map |
| 3 | Convert a selected unit assessment into rigorous standards + PoG PBA | PBA, rubric and accessible options |
| 4 | Connect CTE, personal finance, career exploration, community and work-based learning | Authentic partner brief / experience rubric |
| 5 | Build student reflection, portfolio curation, teacher validation and moderation | Student portfolio and scoring protocol |
| 6 | Peer review transition playbook and share examples | High School Assessment Transition Pack |
Cohort-specific graduation transition checklist, district local assessment map, 1–2 reviewed PBAs, career-readiness evidence rubric, portfolio/advisory routine and family FAQ.
STRAND PLAYBOOK / 03
Driving question: What should students learn and demonstrate in grades 6, 7 and 8 before high school?
| Session | WORKSHOP | OUTPUT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choose grade-band PoG indicators in student-friendly language | 6–8 competency progression |
| 2 | Map existing units by subject, with primary and supporting PoG traits | Grade-level PLC coverage map |
| 3 | Embed two 5–7 minute Mini-Mastery routines into current lessons | Test-ready routine cards |
| 4 | Develop a unit PBA with multiple forms of student evidence | PBA + rubric and accommodations |
| 5 | Review student work, moderate rubric judgments, and sketch optional capstone | Calibrated exemplars and capstone option |
| 6 | Align eighth-grade evidence to ninth-grade handoff | Transition profile + scaling plan |
| GRADE | DEVELOPMENTAL EMPHASIS | ILLUSTRATIVE EVIDENCE |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Name a skill, practice it with feedback; form productive collaboration habits | Short peer discussion and reflection on evidence |
| 7 | Apply a competency independently and across disciplines; revise work | Investigation, comparison of sources, revised product |
| 8 | Integrate multiple competencies in authentic problem solving; defend choices | Interdisciplinary PBA, public audience or capstone |
“Should our community change how it uses water?” Science evaluates environmental evidence; Math models use; ELA develops arguments; Social Studies studies local policy. Teams select a manageable scope and distinguish academic criteria from PoG criteria.
Grade 6–8 progression, a schoolwide or grade-level coverage map, two Mini-Mastery prototypes, one reviewed unit PBA, a portfolio reflection routine and grade-8 transition evidence proposal.
STRAND PLAYBOOK / 04
Driving question: How can we help younger learners practice PoG skills through familiar, joyful, standards-aligned learning?
| Session | WORKSHOP | OUTPUT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Translate PoG attributes into age-appropriate look-fors | K–2 and 3–5 examples |
| 2 | Map competencies to existing literacy, math, inquiry and classroom routines | Curriculum integration map |
| 3 | Create low-burden Mini-Mastery prompts and teacher observations | Two routines by grade band |
| 4 | Design one authentic integrated unit task with accessible responses | Simple PBA + success criteria |
| 5 | Prototype child-friendly reflection, family input and privacy-safe portfolio | Evidence + family communication protocol |
| 6 | Review classroom evidence and agree on grade-band progression | Elementary implementation pack |
| BAND | TEACHING MOVE | EVIDENCE TYPE |
|---|---|---|
| K–2 | Model and name the skill through stories, play, talk, drawing, exploration and teacher observation. Micro-routines may be shorter than 5 minutes. | Photo / drawing, oral explanation, observation notes, family-supported reflection. |
| 3–5 | Use 5–7 minute Mini-Mastery routines, simple student rubrics, problem-solving, collaboration, and small authentic projects. | Written or recorded explanation, revised product, group task, student self-assessment. |
SHARED QUALITY STANDARD
The local assessment strategy is a coherent system of evidence for different purposes, not simply a collection of PBAs.
Plan → Practice → Demonstrate → Capture → Reflect → Review → Improve
Capture evidence only where it adds instructional value. Keep academic standards and PoG rubric ratings identifiable. AI suggestions must cite artifact evidence, and an educator confirms consequential judgments.
Test / Quality Check
Does the task assess important disciplinary learning and an authentic PoG micro-skill?
Are choices, language supports, accommodations and access designed in from the start?
What student product, explanation, process or observation supports each rubric claim?
Can different educators interpret the rubric consistently? Is there a calibration process?
Can students act on feedback, revise and show growth?
Require district-approved tools and data processing; FERPA and applicable New York student privacy compliance; consent/notice as required; human review; bias/error checks; data minimization; and no public release of identifiable student artifacts. CoP exemplars should be de-identified or wholly synthetic.
THE FACILITATOR & DISTRICT TEAM TOOLKIT
Six printable templates support the work, from a team’s first problem of practice to its next 90 days of implementation.
Define your district’s problem of practice, team roles, first artifact, and success by May 2027.
Download template ↓Track policy status, source dates, district actions, and cohort-specific questions.
Download template ↓Connect an existing lesson to an observable PoG skill, a Mini-Mastery routine, student evidence, and feedback.
Download template ↓Plan an authentic unit task, success criteria, accessible response options, and competency coverage across subjects.
Download template ↓Review artifact evidence, student reflections, rubric judgments, and educator-confirmed decisions.
Download template ↓Map stakeholder voices, assign owners, and plan a manageable 90-day implementation sprint.
Download template ↓BEFORE YOUR TEAM BEGINS
Program commitments and guidance drawn from the district team toolkit.
Recommended 2–4 people, including a decision-maker. One district team may participate in multiple strands.
Six monthly sessions. 60 minutes/month + practical between-session work. A 30-minute optional office hour twice monthly for curriculum design or product support.
One implemented or field-tested artifact per team. A shareable, improved artifact with reflection. Named owner, next-90-day plan and a local next step.
Participants bring existing curriculum, collaborate with peers, test practical changes, and leave with usable local assessment tools.
Require district-approved tools and data processing; FERPA and applicable New York student privacy compliance; consent/notice as required; human review; bias/error checks; data minimization; and no public release of identifiable student artifacts. CoP exemplars should be de-identified or wholly synthetic.
OFFICIAL GUIDANCE & RESOURCES
Use official NYSED guidance as the source of truth. Proposed changes must not be described as already-effective requirements.