[Learning Genie] Accessibility Conformance Report
‍Revised Section 508 Edition
(Based on VPAT® Version 2.5)

Name of Product: Learning Genie (Web)

Report Date: March 24, 2025

Product Description: AI Agent for P-12 Curriculum and Portfolio-based Assessment.

Contact Information: help@learning-genie.com

Notes: This conformance report assesses core pages and key user flows, with a focus on keyboard operability, color contrast, ARIA semantics, and screen reader compatibility. Test results are based on the current environment and may vary depending on the device, browser, or assistive technology used.

Evaluation Methods Used: A combination of manual testing and automated tool testing (Lighthouse, WCAG Color contrast checker) was employed for the accessibility assessment, to ensure comprehensive coverage of potential accessibility issues. In addition, certain key workflows were tested with a screen reader (NVDA) to simulate the user experience of visually impaired users. The testing environment included Windows 11, with browser versions Google Chrome 134.0.6998.89 and Microsoft Edge 131.0.2903.112.

Applicable Standards/Guidelines: This report covers the degree of conformance for the following accessibility standard/guidelines:

Terms

The terms used in the Conformance Level information are defined as follows:

  • Supports: The functionality of the product has at least one method that meets the criterion without known defects or meets with equivalent facilitation.
  • Partially Supports: Some functionality of the product does not meet the criterion.
  • Does Not Support: The majority of product functionality does not meet the criterion.
  • Not Applicable: The criterion is not relevant to the product.
  • Not Evaluated: The product has not been evaluated against the criterion. This can only be used in WCAG Level AAA criteria.


WCAG 2.0 Report

Table 1 and Table 2 document conformance of Learning Genie with WCAG 2.0.

Note: When reporting on conformance with the WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria, they are scoped for full pages, complete processes, and accessibility-supported ways of using technology as documented in the WCAG 2.0 Conformance Requirements.

Table 1: Success Criteria, Level A
Criteria
Conformance Level
Remarks and Explanations
Partially Supports
Most non-text content presented to users has text alternatives.
However, exceptions exist:
1. In Curriculum, a plus sign (+) is used to indicate adding weekly planner, missing an aria-label description.
2. In the "Add Teacher" pop-up, the profile image is missing a text alternative.
3. In Assessment Progress, the refresh icon is missing a text alternative.
Supports
Supports
Supports
Partially Supports
Most pages are structured using proper semantic HTML tags.
However, exceptions exist:
1. In Weekly Planning, the display of daily lessons does not correctly utilize a table structure.
2. In Notes Review, the staff list does not use semantically appropriate list tags.
Supports
Partially Supports
Most content in Learning Genie does not rely solely on sensory characteristics.
However, exceptions exist:
1. In the Survey list, an ellipsis icon is used to represent more actions without corresponding text labels.
2. When editing rating period, a plus sign (+) is used to indicate adding a new period, lacking descriptive text.
Supports
Not Applicable
Autoplaying audio is not present in Learning Genie.
Partially Supports
Most interactive features on the page are operable through a keyboard interface without requiring specific timings for individual keystrokes.
However, exceptions exist:
1. In Curriculum, the language switch dropdown menu is not keyboard operable.
2. In Attendance Review, the "Download" button in the "Select Date" modal is not keyboard operable.
3. In Manage Sites, individual sites cannot be expanded via keyboard.
Partially Supports
Focus can be moved away from components in most pages using only a keyboard interface.
However, exceptions exist specifically within rich text editors:
1. School Announcements: Focus remains trapped within rich text editors.
2. Add Curriculum: Focus remains trapped within rich text editors.
Supports
Partially Supports
Learning Genie does not include automatically playing, scrolling, or flashing content, but automatic updates are present in some areas. For the majority of functions, these automatic updates do not create accessibility concerns.
However, an exception is identified in:
1. Chat Interface: When users are reviewing previous messages in the chat interface, the arrival of new messages causes the interface to automatically scroll to the bottom. There is no button for users to manually navigate to the latest messages after reviewing history.
Supports
Partially Supports
For most pages, users can efficiently reach the main content through keyboard focus.
However, exceptions exist:
1. Notes Review: The sidebar navigation menu is not available to be bypassed.
2. Summary Report: The top navigation menu is not available to be bypassed.
Supports
Partially Supports
Across most pages, focusable components receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability.
However, exceptions exist:
1. Assessment Progress: The focus order is unintuitive within the rating period selection.
2. Add Event: The focus order is unintuitive when navigating from the "Event Description" input field to "Upload Media" and "Attach File" buttons.
3. Parent Progress Report: The focus order is unintuitive when navigating from the "Settings" button to the "PDF" button in Action Plan.
Supports
Supports
Supports
Supports
Supports
Partially Supports
Clear labels or instructions are generally provided for most forms.
However, exceptions exist:
1. Engagement/Events: Some elements within the "Add Event" form are missing labels.
2. Add Observation Notes: Form labels are not associated with controls.
3. In-Kind Submission: The form is missing labels.
Partially Supports
Labels are generally used appropriately across most pages.
However, exceptions exist:
1. Homepage: The homepage contains elements with duplicate IDs. IDs must be unique.
2. Curriculum - Language Switch Button: A <div> element is incorrectly nested within a <span> element, violating HTML nesting rules.
Partially Supports
For most user interface components, label attributes are correct.
However, exceptions exist:
1. School Announcements: Form control labels are missing.
2. Family Engagement Echarts: Charts lack ARIA attributes and roles, and are not identifiable.
3. Add New Child: Error messages are not announced due to missing aria-live.
Table 2: Success Criteria, Level AA
Criteria
Conformance Level
Remarks and Explanations
Not Applicable
Learning Genie does not incorporate any live audio content.
Supports
Partially Supports
Across most pages, the visual presentation of background color and text has a contrast ratio compliant with accessibility standards.
However, exceptions exist:
1. The contrast ratio between the text and background of selected menu items in the sidebar is measured at 2.6:1, which is below the requirement of 4.5:1.
2. The contrast ratio for the text on the "Add" button in the Class Engagement list is measured at 2.51:1, which is below the requirement of 4.5:1.
3. The contrast ratio for the text on the "New Unit" action button in the Unit Planner list is measured at 3.13:1, which is below the requirement of 4.5:1.
Partially Supports
Most pages are zoomable.
However, some pages exhibit display issues when zoomed to 200%:
1. Events: At 200% zoom, the table display is incomplete.
2. Parent Progress Report: At 200% zoom, text elements overlap.
Supports
Supports
Partially Supports
Clear headings and labels are generally used in the design.
However, exceptions exist:
1. The title of the "Edit Default Choices" modal within Visual Health Check is not implemented using a semantic HTML heading tag.
2. The "High Precision" toggle switch in the In-Kind Summary Report lacks a descriptive label.
3. Within the "Add Custom Children Attribute" form in Children Attributes, the form labels and associated content areas are not programmatically linked.
Partially Supports
Across most pages, user interface elements provide visible focus indicators.
However, exceptions exist:
1. The Quick Search and PDF Download controls within the Portfolio list lack a visible focus indicator.
2. The selection of Site and Class within the Attendance Review list lacks a visible focus indicator.
Partially Supports
The platform's page language is set based on the pre-set language.
However, there is an exception:
Within the Parent Progress Report, the report content can be independently set to English or Spanish. However, this section of content is not programmatically marked up with language tags to identify the language.
Supports
Supports
Supports
Supports
Table 3: Success Criteria, Level AAA
Notes: Not evaluated
Revised Section 508 Report‍
Criteria
Conformance Level
Remarks and Explanations
302.1 Without Vision
Partially Supports
For the majority of features in Learning Genie, usability is maintained without vision.
However, exceptions exist:
1. In Notes Review, the staff list does not use semantically appropriate list tags and is not identifiable.
2. In Assessment Progress, the refresh icon is missing a text alternative.
3. Charts in Family Engagement Echarts lack ARIA attributes and roles and are not identifiable.
302.2 With Limited Vision
Partially Supports
For the majority of features in Learning Genie, usability is maintained with limited vision.
However, exceptions exist:
1. The contrast ratio for the text on the "Add" button in the Class Engagement list is measured at 2.51:1, which is below the requirement of 4.5:1.
2. At 200% zoom, text elements in Parent Progress Report overlap.3. The contrast ratio for the text on the "New Unit" action button in the Unit Planner list is measured at
3.13:1, which is below the requirement of 4.5:1.
302.3 Without Perception of Color
Supports
302.4 Without Hearing
Supports
Supports
Not Applicable
Learning Genie does not incorporate any speech input functionality.
Partially Supports
For the majority of features in Learning Genie, usability is maintained with limit manipulation.
However, exceptions exist:
1. The signature feature in the In-kind Submission interface requires mouse drag-and-drop interaction to complete.
2. Reordering items in the Drop-off Note list requires mouse drag-and-drop interaction.
Not Applicable
Learning Genie does not provide a manual mode of operation.
Supports
Chapter 4: Hardware
Notes: These criteria are all Not Applicable because Learning Genie is not a Hardware Product.
Chapter 5: Software
Notes: Learning Genie is a web application that does not directly access platform accessibility services. However, due to the inclusion of rich text editing features, certain accessibility standards for authoring tools are relevant and will be briefly discussed.
Criteria
Conformance Level
Remarks and Explanations
504.2 Content Creation or Editing (if not authoring tool, enter "not applicable")
Partially Supports
The rich text editors in Learning Genie generally conform to accessibility requirements.
However, exceptions exist:
1. When users insert images into the rich text editor, there is no feature provided to add alternative text descriptions (alt text). This prevents screen reader users from accessing information conveyed by images.
504.2.1 Preservation of Information Provided for Accessibility in Format Conversion
Not Applicable
Learning Genie's rich text authoring tool does not incorporate any content format conversion.
504.2.2 PDF Export
Not Applicable
Learning Genie's rich text authoring tool does not incorporate any PDF export.
Does Not Support
Learning Genie's rich text authoring tool does not provide a mode of operation that prompts authors to create content that conforms to Level A and Level AA Success Criteria and Conformance Requirements in WCAG 2.0.
Not Applicable
Learning Genie's rich text authoring tool does not incorporate any template.
Criteria
Conformance Level
Remarks and Explanations
602.2 Accessibility and Compatibility Features
Does Not Support
FAQS of Learning Genie do not list and explain how to use the accessibility and compatibility features.
602.3 Electronic Support Documentation
Partially Supports
Electronic support documentation in Learning Genie generally conforms to Level A and Level AA Success Criteria and Conformance Requirements in WCAG 2.0.
However, exceptions exist:
1. Images within the School Announcement feature manual lack alternative text (alt text).
2. The Auto Play Settings feature manual does not utilize semantic heading levels.
Does Not Support
Learning Genie does not incorporate any non-electronic documentation.
Partially Supports
FAQS of Learning Genie do not list and explain how to use the accessibility and compatibility features. However, our technical support and customer service teams are equipped to provide users with information on these functionalities.
603.3 Accommodation of Communication Needs
Supports
Customers can contact Learning Genie customer service via phone, chat, or email.